Give feedback to 2PR AI Ghostwriter

Tell us how we could make the product more useful to you.

Compare Original vs AI-Optimised LinkedIn Post

Feature Request: Compare Original vs AI-Optimised LinkedIn Post I’d like to see a comparison when creating a new LinkedIn post, so I can choose between: Use as-is: Keep my original version. AI optimise: Let 2PR improve the post for LinkedIn. The comparison should show how each version is expected to perform within my niche, based on the topic, context, audience and post format. Ideally, it would include indicators such as: Predicted engagement potential Relevance to my niche and audience Strength of the hook Readability and structure Topic/keyword relevance LinkedIn SEO discoverability GEO/AEO potential where relevant Clear reasons why the AI version is expected to perform better This would work similarly to SEO or GEO/AEO article optimisation, where I can understand what changed, why it changed and what impact it may have. At the moment, it can be difficult to trust the suggested draft over my original post because there is no clear comparison or explanation of why the new version should perform better. The goal is not just to generate another version, but to give me enough insight to decide whether to use it, tweak it or keep my original.

Marcus 10 days ago

inkedIn Trend Researcher

A built-in research engine that continuously identifies what is currently gaining traction on LinkedIn, by niche, topic, audience, geography and content format. The user should be able to choose any niche, for example AI, SaaS, UX, fashion, finance, leadership or e-commerce, and receive daily, weekly or monthly research updates. The researcher should surface: Top-performing LinkedIn posts in the selected niche Emerging topics and conversations gaining momentum Recurring hooks and opening patterns Post formats performing best, such as text, carousel, document, image or video Engagement velocity, not just total likes Comment volume and quality Reposts and discussion depth where available Creator/account size so performance can be normalised Topics that are becoming saturated versus still emerging Recommended angles that have not already been overused A particularly valuable part would be visual trend research. 2PR should identify the best-performing scroll-stopping post covers and visual styles in the selected niche, showing the actual visual examples where platform permissions allow it. For each visual, analyse elements such as: Cover composition Headline length Typography Human face vs product vs graphic Camera angle Contrast Background style Colour usage Text placement Visual hierarchy Curiosity gap Screenshot/interface style Before/after format Diagram or infographic style Minimal vs information-dense design Then explain why the visual probably stopped the scroll, instead of simply showing popular posts. I would also add a ranking system: Trend Score Momentum Engagement velocity Audience relevance Novelty Saturation Visual stopping power Replication potential The output could become something like: Daily 5 emerging topics + 10 breakout posts + 5 high-performing covers. Weekly Top trends, winning hooks, visual patterns, declining themes and recommended opportunities for the next 7 days. Monthly Larger market shifts, repeated winning formats, creator benchmarks, visual direction changes and niche-specific content opportunities. The strongest differentiator would be connecting research directly to creation: Trend → Winning Post → Visual Pattern → Suggested Angle → Draft → Cover Concept → Schedule That would move 2PR beyond a LinkedIn publishing/engagement tool and closer to a complete LinkedIn Content Intelligence system. I would also make one distinction very clear: the feature should not simply copy top-performing posts. It should extract the underlying pattern, explain why it worked, and generate a new angle adapted to the user's own positioning. That is where the real value is.

Marcus 10 days ago

Advanced Brand & Content Knowledge Base

I’d love to see a deeper knowledge layer for each profile or workspace so 2PR understands not only how I write, but also what I know, what I sell, who I serve and what I should or should not say. It could include: • Upload PDFs, documents, URLs and notes • Brand positioning and messaging • Products and services • Target audiences / ICPs • Case studies and proof points • Competitors • Approved terminology • Claims or topics to avoid • Personal stories and experience • CTA library • Offer library The current persona-trained writing is useful, but a structured knowledge base could make generated posts more strategically accurate and reduce generic AI output. 2PR already positions its AI around writing in the user’s voice, so this would extend that from “voice” into “business context.”

Marcus 11 days ago

Turn Engage Comments Into a Lead Conversion Engine

I’d love to see Engage in Comments expanded beyond AI-assisted replies into a lightweight lead capture and conversion layer. 2PR already centralises engagement through its Engage Inbox and operates through LinkedIn’s official API, so I think the next opportunity is helping users identify which comments represent genuine commercial intent and what action to take next. For example, when someone comments: “Interested” “Can you send me this?” “How much does this cost?” “Would love to learn more” 2PR could recognise this as lead intent and surface conversion actions directly inside Engage. Suggested functionality: • AI detection of lead intent and buying signals • Automatically classify comments as Engagement, Question, Lead or High Intent • Convert to Lead action directly beside a comment • Capture relevant LinkedIn profile/company context where permitted • Automatically tag leads based on the post, topic or intent • AI reply suggestions optimised for moving the conversation forward, rather than only generating engagement • Suggested next actions such as Start Conversation, Send Resource, Send Booking Link, Add to CRM, Qualify Lead or Assign to Team Member • Webhook/CRM integrations for sending qualified leads into external sales workflows • Lead status and follow-up tracking inside Engage • Analytics connecting Post → Comment → Conversation → Lead → Qualified Lead → Customer The key opportunity is to make Engage measurable beyond likes and replies. Instead of only asking: “Which posts generate engagement?” 2PR could help answer: “Which posts generate leads, conversations and revenue?” The ideal workflow would become: Comment → Detect Intent → Start Conversation → Capture Lead → Qualify → Convert This would strengthen 2PR’s existing positioning around the complete LinkedIn content workflow while keeping the conversion layer integrated directly into Engage rather than requiring another standalone tool.

Marcus 11 days ago

Custom Source Watchlists + Scheduled Research

It would be great to add your own trusted research sources — podcasts, blogs, newsletters, YouTube channels, RSS feeds and websites — and schedule them for daily or weekly monitoring. The system could detect only newly published content, extract emerging topics and useful insights, then suggest fresh article opportunities based on those signals. Ideally include: • Daily / weekly schedules • Source groups by website or niche • Topic and keyword filters • Original-source citations • Duplicate-topic detection • Alerts when several sources discuss the same emerging topic This would turn UseArticle from mainly an automated publishing tool into an ongoing research and content-intelligence engine.

Marcus 14 days ago